Table 5 Effects of sibling sex composition by socioeconomic status, household registration status, and relative status of the mother
From: Sibling sex composition, intrahousehold resource allocation, and educational attainment in China
Independent variables | Model (1) | Model (2) | Model (3) | Model (4) | Model (5) | Model (6) | Model (7) | Model (8) | Model (9) | Model (10) | Model (11) | Model (12) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Have urban residential registration | 2.145*** (0.231) | 2.137*** (0.233) | 2.142*** (0.230) | 2.134*** (0.230) | 2.146*** (0.233) | 2.126*** (0.227) | 1.806*** (0.306) | 2.074*** (0.254) | 1.556*** (0.233) | 2.130*** (0.231) | 2.151*** (0.234) | 2.132*** (0.230) |
Han ethnic group | 0.930*** (0.313) | 0.941*** (0.318) | 0.928*** (0.310) | 0.934*** (0.313) | 0.935*** (0.314) | 0.936*** (0.312) | 0.925*** (0.314) | 0.639* (0.344) | 0.641* (0.342) | 0.928*** (0.313) | 0.936*** (0.314) | 0.934*** (0.311) |
Age | −0.060*** (0.009) | −0.058*** (0.009) | −0.059*** (0.009) | −0.059*** (0.009) | −0.060*** (0.009) | −0.058*** (0.009) | −0.059*** (0.009) | −0.064*** (0.007) | −0.064*** (0.007) | −0.059*** (0.009) | −0.060*** (0.009) | −0.058*** (0.009) |
Female | −1.571*** (0.125) | −1.593*** (0.126) | 1.838*** (0.165) | −1.568*** (0.124) | 1.591*** (0.125) | 1.841*** (0.165) | 1.566*** (0.124) | 1.354*** (0.107) | −1.535*** (0.126) | 1.566*** (0.124) | 1.591*** (0.125) | 1.836*** (0.165) |
Parental education | 0.190*** (0.040) | 0.316*** (0.040) | 0.168*** (0.036) | 0.237*** (0.024) | 0.238*** (0.025) | 0.237*** (0.024) | 0.236*** (0.024) | 0.238*** (0.017) | 0.238*** (0.017) | 0.235*** (0.024) | 0.238*** (0.025) | 0.234*** (0.024) |
Father’s ISEI | 0.010 (0.006) | 0.010* (0.006) | 0.009 (0.006) | −0.013 (0.011) | 0.019* (0.010) | 0.022* (0.012) | 0.009 (0.006) | 0.008* (0.004) | 0.009* (0.004) | 0.010 (0.006) | 0.010 (0.006) | 0.010 (0.006) |
Father’s ISEI missing | −0.982*** (0.170) | −0.970*** (0.167) | −0.978*** (0.171) | −0.996*** (0.167) | −0.982*** (0.169) | 1.000*** (0.167) | 0.984*** (0.168) | −0.921*** (0.132) | −0.910*** (0.134) | −0.977*** (0.170) | −0.977*** (0.170) | −0.969*** (0.170) |
Father was a member of CCP | 0.473** (0.216) | 0.433** (0.216) | 0.541** (0.216) | 0.463** (0.216) | 0.460** (0.215) | 0.485** (0.216) | 0.482** (0.215) | 0.573*** (0.154) | 0.591*** (0.153) | 0.478** (0.216) | 0.462** (0.214) | 0.491** (0.215) |
Sibling number | −0.175*** (0.043) | −0.217*** (0.050) | −0.216*** (0.043) | −0.180*** (0.043) | −0.206*** (0.048) | −0.218*** (0.043) | −0.179*** (0.043) | −0.211*** (0.046) | −0.228*** (0.044) | −0.179*** (0.043) | −0.207*** (0.048) | 0.217*** (0.043) |
Ranking among siblings at birth | 0.155*** (0.040) | 0.158*** (0.040) | 0.156*** (0.039) | 0.157*** (0.040) | 0.154*** (0.040) | 0.156*** (.040) | 0.156*** (0.040) | 0.139*** (0.033) | 0.141*** (0.033) | 0.155*** (0.040) | 0.154*** (0.040) | 0.157*** (0.040) |
Sibling sex composition | −0.721*** (0.260) | 0.559** (0.244) | 0.332 (0.384) | −1.632*** (0.539) | 0.537 (0.566) | 2.296** (0.900) | −0.508* (0.260) | −0.057 (0.174) | 0.382 (0.273) | −0.417** (0.203) | 0.049 (0.167) | 0.995*** (0.331) |
Sibling sex composition × parental education level | 0.054 (0.037) | −0.096*** (0.031) | 0.141*** (0.054) | |||||||||
Sibling sex composition × father’s ISEI | 0.027** (0.012) | −0.011 (0.013) | −0.028 (0.020) | |||||||||
Sibling sex composition × urban household registration | 0.393 (0.356) | −0.106 (0.233) | 0.888** (0.364) | |||||||||
Sibling sex composition × relative status of mother | 0.143 (0.156) | −0.042 (0.207) | 0.399 (0.306) | |||||||||
Constant | 9.410*** (0.589) | 8.328*** (0.696) | 8.861*** (0.643) | 10.138*** (0.716) | 8.422*** (0.703) | 7.898*** (0.703) | 9.203*** (0.567) | 9.834*** (0.554) | 9.707*** (0.569) | 9.100*** (0.572) | 8.816*** (0.640) | 8.464*** (0.637) |
R 2 | 0.356 | 0.356 | 0.358 | 0.357 | 0.354 | 0.357 | 0.355 | 0.366 | 0.368 | 0.355 | 0.354 | 0.357 |
N | 5,271 | 5,271 | 5,271 | 5,271 | 5,271 | 5,271 | 5,271 | 5,271 | 5,271 | 5,271 | 5,271 | 5,271 |