Table 6 The effects of sibling sex composition on different birth cohorts
From: Sibling sex composition, intrahousehold resource allocation, and educational attainment in China
Independent variable | Model (1) | Model (2) | Model (3) |
|---|---|---|---|
Have urban residential registration | 2.143*** (0.234) | 2.151*** (0.238) | 2.155*** (0.234) |
Han ethnic group | 0.893*** (0.306) | 0.885*** (0.301) | 0.889*** (0.308) |
Cohort 2 | −0.403 (0.641) | 0.157 (0.637) | 0.425 (0.546) |
Cohort 3 | 1.378* (0.791) | 1.330 (0.824) | 0.887 (0.648) |
Cohort 4 | 1.570** (0.641) | 1.457** (0.608) | 0.911** (0.507) |
Cohort 5 | 2.018*** (0.602) | 2.741*** (0.603) | 1.461** (0.646) |
Female | −1.555*** (0.125) | −1.587*** (0.124) | −1.825*** (0.160) |
Parental education level | 0.237*** (0.024) | 0.238*** (0.024) | 0.237*** (0.023) |
Father’s ISEI | 0.009 (0.006) | 0.009 (0.006) | 0.008 (0.006) |
Father’s ISEI missing | −0.983*** (0.166) | −0.975*** (0.167) | −0.998*** (0.168) |
Father was a member of CCP | 0.499** (0.214) | 0.482** (0.209) | 0.538** (0.215) |
Sibling number | −0.170*** (0.044) | −0.206*** (0.050) | −0.208*** (0.044) |
Ranking among siblings at birth | 0.140*** (0.041) | 0.143*** (0.041) | 0.136*** (0.039) |
Sibling sex composition × cohort 1 | −0.342 (0.596) | 0.605 (0.593) | 0.749 (0.806) |
Sibling sex composition × cohort 2 | −0.034 (0.328) | 0.261 (0.298) | −0.413 (0.472) |
Sibling sex composition × cohort 3 | −0.593 (0.492) | 0.356 (0.630) | 1.264* (0.745) |
Sibling sex composition × cohort 4 | −0.925** (0.367) | 0.095 (0.270) | 0.998** (0.485) |
Sibling sex composition × cohort 5 | −0.321 (0.322) | −0.303 (0.190) | 1.814*** (0.540) |
Constant | 5.532*** (0.670) | 4.841*** (0.677) | 5.193*** (0.615) |
R 2 | 0.361 | 0.360 | 0.364 |
N | 5,271 | 5,271 | 5,271 |