Skip to main content

Table 5 Province-level panel analysis of the determinants of collective labor disputes, 1999 to 2011

From: Can the strategy of “mediate first” reduce collective labor disputes?—An empirical test based on province-level panel data from 1999 to 2011

Models

(1)

(2)

Dependent variables

Average involved workers per collective dispute case accepted by arbitration institutions (Ln)

Proportion of collective dispute cases accepted by arbitration institutions (Ln)

Explanatory variables

  

Mediatory capacity of labor arbitration institutions

−0.923*

−0.066

 

(0.400)

(0.444)

Control variables

  

Appeal rate of labor arbitration by workers (Ln)

−0.298*

0.315*

 

(0.134)

(0.119)

Ratio of social-security disputes to payment disputes(Ln)

0.076

−0.169*

 

(0.078)

(0.071)

Expenditures on political and legal affairs per capita (Ln)

0.276

0.061

 

(0.295)

(0.391)

Coverage of enterprise mediation committees

0.006

0.000

 

(0.004)

(0.005)

GDP per capita (Ln)

0.043

−1.065

 

(0.461)

(0.553)

FDI dependency

−3.232

11.099**

 

(4.150)

(4.082)

Scale of urban labor

0.001**

−0.000

 

(0.000)

(0.000)

Marketization of labor

−0.112

−0.178

 

(1.087)

(1.105)

Ratio of employees in secondary industry to those in tertiary industry

−0.455

−0.324

 

(0.425)

(0.440)

Unemployment rate

0.349**

−0.035

 

(0.114)

(0.136)

Ratio of resident population to registered population

−2.669

3.977**

 

(1.434)

(1.515)

Constants

154.539

27.471

 

(155.373)

(207.752)

Province-fixed effects

Yes

Yes

Period-fixed effects

Yes

Yes

Province-specific time trend

Yes

Yes

Observations

280

280

R-squared

0.500

0.722

  1. Huber-White standard errors in parentheses
  2. *,**,***Denote significance at the 95, 99, and 99.9 % levels, respectively