Skip to main content

Table 3 The ML estimation of interaction coefficients in urban and suburb areas, minor children, age, and gender (N = 1033)

From: Personal resources, family factors, and remarriage: an analysis based on CFPS2010 data

Variable Model 7 Model 8 Model 9 Model 10
Gendera −.76*** (.12) −.46*** (.10) −.35*** (.08) −.25 (.17)
Household registrationb −.57*** (.12) −.56** (.11) −.17* (.09) −.18* (.09)
No minor children cohabit 1.11*** (.24) .64** (.32) 1.27*** (.24) 1.11*** (.25)
Minor children cohabit 1.08*** (.09) .97*** (.12) .96*** (.12) 1.13 *** (.09)
25–35 years oldd −.63*** (.07) −.67*** (.14) −.63*** (.14) −.29 (.19)
35–45 years old −.65*** (.13) −.73 *** (.13) −.65*** (.13) −.32+ (.18)
Above 45 years old −.92*** (.16) −1.04*** (.16) −.96*** (.16) −.73*** (.22)
Father or mother alivee −.02 (.08) −.00 (.08) −.16 (.11) −.03 (.08)
Gender × household registration .77*** (.15)    
Gender × no minor children cohabit   1.02** (.42)   
Gender × minor children cohabit   .30* (.15)   
Father or mother alive × no minor children cohabit    −.92 (.73)  
Father or mother alive × minor children cohabit    −.35* (.16)  
Gender × 25–35 years old     −.20 (.19)
Gender × 35–45 years old     −.18 (.24)
Gender × above 45 years old     .45+ (.26)
Log likelihood −3969 −3536 −3528 −3536
Chi-square statistic 365.6 336.3 397.8 315.8
  1. Due to space limitations, only variables involved in the analysis of interactions are listed in the table. Other variables include region, nationality, family size, size of social network of relatives, whether or not the respondent belongs to a clan, employment, logarithm of annual income, education, housing conditions, and housing problems
  2. +Means p < 0.1, *means p < 0.05, **means p < 0.01, ***means p < 0.001(two-tailed test)
  3. aFemales as the reference category. bRural region as the reference category. cHaving no minor children as the reference category. dAge below 25 as the reference category. eRespondent’s parents are not alive as the reference category