Skip to main content

Table 2 Opportunities, resources, strategies, frames, and protest success: results of fsQCA

From: Multi-channelled forceful intervention, frames and protest success—a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative study of 40 anti-demolition protests in China

Theory Causal path Consistency Raw coverage Unique coverage
Political opportunity CGOV * CMEDIA 0.87 0.57 0.57
Resource mobilization IS
Protest tactics IS
Frames F1: weak * SOCIALISM * COLLECTIVISM 1 0.26 0.26
F2: SOCIALISM * COLLECTIVISM * ru_violation 1 0.16 0.05
F3: WEAK * socialism * collectivism * RU_VIOLATION 1 0.05 0.05
[solution] 1 0.36 0.36
  1. Note: IS represents being insufficient to explain protest success, in which case consistency has no meaning, shown as “–”