Skip to main content

Table 2 Opportunities, resources, strategies, frames, and protest success: results of fsQCA

From: Multi-channelled forceful intervention, frames and protest success—a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative study of 40 anti-demolition protests in China

Theory

Causal path

Consistency

Raw coverage

Unique coverage

Political opportunity

CGOV * CMEDIA

0.87

0.57

0.57

Resource mobilization

IS

Protest tactics

IS

Frames

F1: weak * SOCIALISM * COLLECTIVISM

1

0.26

0.26

F2: SOCIALISM * COLLECTIVISM * ru_violation

1

0.16

0.05

F3: WEAK * socialism * collectivism * RU_VIOLATION

1

0.05

0.05

[solution]

1

0.36

0.36

  1. Note: IS represents being insufficient to explain protest success, in which case consistency has no meaning, shown as “–”