Skip to main content

Table 3 The conditions for “multi-channelled forceful intervention”

From: Multi-channelled forceful intervention, frames and protest success—a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative study of 40 anti-demolition protests in China

Theory Causal path Consistency Raw coverage Unique coverage
Resource mobilization IS
Protest tactics IS
Frames F1: WEAK * SOCIALISM * COLLECTIVISM *ru_violation 1 0.08 0.08
F2: weak * SOCIALISM * RU_VIOLATION 0.95 0.30 0.30
[solution] 0.96 0.38 0.38
Institutional environment * frames IF1: OBOPP * SOCIALISM * COLLECTIVISM * ru_violation 1 0.16 0.16
IF2: OBOPP * weak * SOCIALISM * RU_VIOLATION 0.93 0.21 0.08
IF3: OBOPP * weak * COLLECTIVISM * RU_VIOLATION 1 0.18 0.05
IF4: weak * SOCIALISM * COLLECTIVISM * RU_VIOLATION 0.93 0.22 0.10
[solution] 0.94 0.51 0.51
  1. Note: IS represents being unable to form sufficient conditions such that consistency has no meaning, shown as “–”