Skip to main content

Table 3 The conditions for “multi-channelled forceful intervention”

From: Multi-channelled forceful intervention, frames and protest success—a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative study of 40 anti-demolition protests in China

Theory

Causal path

Consistency

Raw coverage

Unique coverage

Resource mobilization

IS

Protest tactics

IS

Frames

F1: WEAK * SOCIALISM * COLLECTIVISM *ru_violation

1

0.08

0.08

F2: weak * SOCIALISM * RU_VIOLATION

0.95

0.30

0.30

[solution]

0.96

0.38

0.38

Institutional environment * frames

IF1: OBOPP * SOCIALISM * COLLECTIVISM * ru_violation

1

0.16

0.16

IF2: OBOPP * weak * SOCIALISM * RU_VIOLATION

0.93

0.21

0.08

IF3: OBOPP * weak * COLLECTIVISM * RU_VIOLATION

1

0.18

0.05

IF4: weak * SOCIALISM * COLLECTIVISM * RU_VIOLATION

0.93

0.22

0.10

[solution]

0.94

0.51

0.51

  1. Note: IS represents being unable to form sufficient conditions such that consistency has no meaning, shown as “–”