Skip to main content

Table 8 Logistic coefficients regressing daughter’s and son’s religious affiliation on father’s and mother’s religious preference

From: Family Structure, Market Competition and Local Culture: The Mechanisms of Religious mobility beyond Christianity

 

Model 1

Model 2

Model 3

Model 4

Model 5

Model 6

Model 7

Model 8

Daughter

Son

Apostasy

Buddhism

Daoism

Christianity

Apostasy

Buddhism

Daoism

Christianity

Father

Apostasy

1.847***

.341

− .039

1.095**

2.046***

− .084

1.060

− .159

(.313)

(.402)

(1.036)

(.511)

(.314)

(.562)

(.848)

(.965)

Buddhism

− .233

1.752***

− .545

1.120*

− .290

1.858***

− .151

.465

(.386)

(.352)

(1.043)

(.603)

(.382)

(.369)

(.921)

(.794)

Daoism

.102

.188

1.987*

.533

− .260

.758

2.979***

.050

(.515)

(.543)

(1.028)

(.894)

(.488)

(.749)

(.718)

(.927)

Christianity

.181

.292

− .241

2.968***

− .109

.146

− .061

3.568***

(.566)

(.597)

(1.282)

(.525)

(.535)

(.986)

(1.091)

(.741)

Mother

Apostasy

2.039***

− .609

− .144

− .703

2.308***

.106

− 1.622

− .006

(.343)

(.496)

(1.428)

(.559)

(.387)

(.693)

(1.268)

(.933)

Buddhism

.343

2.118***

1.065

− 1.640***

.350

2.716***

.288

− .166

(.358)

(.342)

(1.037)

(.571)

(.368)

(.374)

(.860)

(.782)

Daoism

.281

.360

3.405***

− .208

.194

− .661

3.242***

.383

(.509)

(.552)

(1.072)

(.882)

(.479)

(.785)

(.720)

(.896)

Christianity

− .382

− .158

1.576

2.228***

.074

− 1.142

.716

2.576***

(.539)

(.585)

(1.258)

(.481)

(.534)

(1.081)

(.996)

(.746)

Includes control variables, county, and year fixed effects

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

N

2803

2818

2708

2756

2912

2897

2912

2812

Pseudo R2

.288

.384

.534

.471

.289

.505

.659

.549

  1. Note: Standard errors are in parentheses
  2. *p < .1 **p < .05 ***p < .01