Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 3 Logistic regression results of home ownership (owned vs. not owned)

From: Housing inequality in urban China: the heritage of socialist institutional arrangements

  Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
Intercept − 0.78*** (0.16) − 0.34+ (0.18) − 0.67*** (0.17)
Householder’s age 0.01*** (0.00) − 7.1e−05 (0.003) 0.01*** (0.00)
Householder’s education 0.08*** (0.01) 0.08*** (0.01) 0.08*** (0.01)
Family income per capita (10 thousand) 0.19*** (0.02) 0.19*** (0.02) 0.18*** (0.02)
Housing subsidies
 One-time subsidy 0.84*** (0.08) 0.83*** (0.08) 0.84* (0.08)
 Monthly subsidies 0.15+ (0.08) 0.22** (0.08) 0.16*** (0.08)
 None (ref.)
Family structure
 3 generations in hh 0.49*** (0.09) 0.50*** (0.09) 0.49*** (0.09)
 2 generations in hh 0.25*** (0.06) 0.26*** (0.06) 0.25*** (0.06)
 1 person hh − 0.74*** (0.08) − 0.74*** (0.08) − 0.74*** (0.08)
 Other type − 1.23*** (0.18) − 1.27*** (0.18) − 1.26*** (0.18)
1 generation (couple) in hh (ref.)
Householder’s work unit
 Government/party organization    0.17+ (0.10)
 Public institution    0.15* (0.07)
 State-owned enterprise    0.20*** (0.05)
 Collectively owned enterprise    − 0.20* (0.08)
 Self-employed laborer    0.01 (0.08)
 Unemployed    − 0.41*** (0.07)
 Private/other enterprise (ref.)
State-owned sector 0.29*** (0.04) − 0.80*** (0.18)  
State-owned sector* householder’s age   0.03*** (0.004)  
N 18,150 18,150 18,150
− 2 Log likelihood 15,054.09 15,016.53 16,052.03
Nagelkerke R square 0.090 0.093 0.093
  1. Note: + p < .10,*p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001