From: Housing inequality in urban China: the heritage of socialist institutional arrangements
Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |
---|---|---|---|
Intercept | − 0.78*** (0.16) | − 0.34+ (0.18) | − 0.67*** (0.17) |
Householder’s age | 0.01*** (0.00) | − 7.1e−05 (0.003) | 0.01*** (0.00) |
Householder’s education | 0.08*** (0.01) | 0.08*** (0.01) | 0.08*** (0.01) |
Family income per capita (10 thousand) | 0.19*** (0.02) | 0.19*** (0.02) | 0.18*** (0.02) |
Housing subsidies | |||
One-time subsidy | 0.84*** (0.08) | 0.83*** (0.08) | 0.84* (0.08) |
Monthly subsidies | 0.15+ (0.08) | 0.22** (0.08) | 0.16*** (0.08) |
None (ref.) | |||
Family structure | |||
3 generations in hh | 0.49*** (0.09) | 0.50*** (0.09) | 0.49*** (0.09) |
2 generations in hh | 0.25*** (0.06) | 0.26*** (0.06) | 0.25*** (0.06) |
1 person hh | − 0.74*** (0.08) | − 0.74*** (0.08) | − 0.74*** (0.08) |
Other type | − 1.23*** (0.18) | − 1.27*** (0.18) | − 1.26*** (0.18) |
1 generation (couple) in hh (ref.) | |||
Householder’s work unit | |||
Government/party organization | 0.17+ (0.10) | ||
Public institution | 0.15* (0.07) | ||
State-owned enterprise | 0.20*** (0.05) | ||
Collectively owned enterprise | − 0.20* (0.08) | ||
Self-employed laborer | 0.01 (0.08) | ||
Unemployed | − 0.41*** (0.07) | ||
Private/other enterprise (ref.) | |||
State-owned sector | 0.29*** (0.04) | − 0.80*** (0.18) | |
State-owned sector* householder’s age | 0.03*** (0.004) | ||
N | 18,150 | 18,150 | 18,150 |
− 2 Log likelihood | 15,054.09 | 15,016.53 | 16,052.03 |
Nagelkerke R square | 0.090 | 0.093 | 0.093 |