Table 4 Multinomial logistic regression results of housing type (dependent variable: type of home ownership; reference category: not owned)
From: Housing inequality in urban China: the heritage of socialist institutional arrangements
Owned: commercial apartment | Owned: middle/low price commercial apartment | Owned: housing obtained during housing reform | |
|---|---|---|---|
Intercept | − 0.89*** (0.20) | 1.58*** (0.28) | − 3.62*** (0.20) |
Householder’s age | − 0.03*** (0.00) | − 0.02*** (0.00) | 0.05*** (0.00) |
Householder’s education | 0.15*** (0.01) | − 0.09*** (0.01) | 0.09*** (0.01) |
Family income per capita (10 thousand) | 0.28*** (0.02) | − 0.4*** (0.05) | 0.10*** (0.02) |
Housing subsidies | |||
One-time subsidy | 0.97*** (0.09) | 0.37* (0.15) | 0.84*** (0.09) |
Monthly subsidies | 0.32*** (0.09) | − 0.02 (0.16) | 0.03 (0.09) |
None (ref.) | |||
Family structure | |||
3 generations in hh | 0.59*** (0.10) | 0.10 (0.13) | 0.63*** (0.10) |
2 generations in hh | 0.24*** (0.07) | − 0.04 (0.09) | 0.48*** (0.06) |
1 person hh | − 1.11*** (0.09) | − 0.58 (0.14) | − 0.43*** (0.09) |
Other type | − 1.98*** (0.26) | − 1.33 (0.37) | − 0.65** (0.23) |
1 generation (couple) in hh (ref.) | |||
Householder’s work unit | |||
Government/party organization | − 0.05 (0.11) | − 0.15 (0.20) | 0.47*** (0.11) |
Public institution | − 0.22** (0.08) | − 0.24+ (0.14) | 0.56*** (0.08) |
State-owned enterprise | − 0.13*** (0.06) | − 0.62*** (0.09) | 0.65*** (0.06) |
Collectively owned enterprise | − 0.37*** (0.10) | − 0.44*** (0.13) | 0.10 (0.09) |
Self-employed laborer | 0.45*** (0.08) | − 0.06*** (0.11) | − 0.54*** (0.10) |
Unemployed | − 0.50*** (0.09) | − 0.47*** (0.10) | − 0.39*** (0.08) |
Private/other enterprise (ref.) | |||
N | 18,150 | ||
− 2 Log likelihood | 37,152.01 | ||
Nagelkerke R square | 0.296 | ||