Skip to main content

Table 3 The influence of spousal relationship on intergenerational resource allocation in the family N = 1139

From: Marital power, spousal relationship, and intergenerational support

Variable

Model 3 Economic support to paternal parents

Model 4 Economic support to maternal parents

Model 5 Economic support to paternal parents

Model 6 Economic support to maternal parents

Wife’s marital power

  

−.09+ (.05)

.02 (.06)

Spousal relationship

.17** (.06)

.16** (.06)

.17** (.06)

.16** (.06)

Wife’s age

.02* (.01)

− .01 (.01)

.02* (.01)

− .01 (.01)

Wife’s education level

.17* (.09)

.10 (.10)

.18* (.09)

.07 (.10)

Education gap between husband and wife

− .23** (.07)

− .10 (.07)

− .23** (.07)

− .09 (.07)

Household income (10,000 RMB)

.03** (.01)

.08* (.04)

.03* (.01)

.08+ (.04)

Parental support from husband’s parents in the past (compared to “a little”)

 Some

.08 (.15)

 

.09 (.15)

 

 Quite a lot

.43 (.40)

 

.43 (.40)

 

Parental support from wife’s parents in the past (compared to “a little”)

 Some

 

.06 (.14)

 

.03 (.14)

 Quite a lot

 

.38 (.37)

 

.28 (.38)

Coresidence with parents

24 (.21)

− .30 (.19)

.20 (.21)

− .30 (.20)

Husband’s siblings

.03 (.04)

 

.04 (.04)

 

Wife’s siblings

 

.06 (.05)

 

.06 (.05)

Hukou

.21 (.19)

− .09 (.19)

.19 (.19)

− .07 (.19)

Region (compared to “central”)

 East

.28+ (.16)

.42* (.17)

.28+ (.16)

.37* (.17)

 West

.20 (.20)

− .06 (.19)

.18 (.20)

− .07 (.19)

 Pseudo R2

.02

.03

.02

.03

  1. + p < 0.01; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001. Values in brackets are standard errors