Table 3 Income and spicy preference
From: Accounting for tastes: do low-income populations have a higher preference for spicy foods?
| Â | (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
OLOGIT | OLS | OLOGIT | OLS | |
PCI(log) | − 0.0371*** (0.0116) | − 0.0216*** (0.00670) | − 0.0289** (0.0126) | − 0.0164** (0.00697) |
Household registration status |  |  | − 0.103*** (0.0382) | − 0.0541*** (0.0195) |
Marital status | Â | Â | 0.149*** (0.0440) | 0.0754*** (0.0221) |
Male | Â | Â | 0.232*** (0.0321) | 0.120*** (0.0167) |
Age |  |  | − 0.00930*** (0.00132) | − 0.00479*** (0.000667) |
Years of schooling |  |  | − 0.00149 (0.00507) | − 0.000934 (0.00257) |
Locations | ||||
 Heilongjiang |  |  | 0.125* (0.0718) | 0.0665* (0.0386) |
 Jiangsu |  |  | − 0.329*** (0.0725) | − 0.163*** (0.0355) |
 Shandong |  |  | − 0.186*** (0.0710) | − 0.0999*** (0.0360) |
 Henan |  |  | − 0.160** (0.0753) | − 0.0832** (0.0385) |
 Hubei |  |  | − 0.182*** (0.0702) | − 0.0951*** (0.0356) |
 Hunan |  |  | 0.389*** (0.0630) | 0.210*** (0.0340) |
 Guangxi |  |  | − 0.195** (0.0786) | − 0.0986** (0.0396) |
 Guizhou |  |  | 0.440*** (0.0620) | 0.240*** (0.0334) |
Employment | ||||
 Junior worker |  |  | 0.0939** (0.0387) | 0.0454** (0.0201) |
 Senior worker |  |  | 0.144** (0.0573) | 0.0747** (0.0305) |
 Manager |  |  | 0.279*** (0.0688) | 0.147*** (0.0378) |
Cons | Â | 1.773*** (0.0601) | Â | 1.811*** (0.0768) |
cut1 | − 0.326*** (0.104) |  | − 0.415*** (0.142) |  |
cut2 | 1.059*** (0.105) | Â | 1.041*** (0.143) | Â |
Observations | 5964 | 5964 | 5964 | 5964 |