Table 4 Estimated two-way margins of 4 cluster LCA models by Xin Liu’s class scheme: 2010 CGSS
From: Class structure and income inequality in transitional China
Row proportion | Column proportion | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cluster 1 | Cluster 2 | Cluster 3 | Cluster 4 | Cluster 1 | Cluster 2 | Cluster 3 | Cluster 4 | ||
I. Command | 0.0 | 21.0 | 44.3 | 34.7 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 9.5 | 9.0 | |
II. Upper new middle | 0.5 | 26.9 | 69.2 | 3.4 | 0.1 | 4.6 | 52.5 | 3.1 | |
III. Lower new middle | 0.5 | 79.3 | 15.5 | 4.7 | 0.2 | 34.6 | 29.9 | 10.9 | |
IV. Small business owner and self-employed | 43.6 | 4.0 | 0.1 | 52.3 | 9.6 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 69.0 | |
V. Skilled worker | 0.4 | 93.7 | 3.9 | 2.0 | 0.1 | 23.6 | 4.3 | 2.7 | |
VI. Unskilled worker | 1.1 | 95.1 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 0.3 | 34.4 | 3.2 | 3.5 | |
VII. Farmer | 98.9 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 89.7 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 1.8 | |