Skip to main content

Table 2 Impact of gender role attitudes on labor income

From: Gender role attitudes and male-female income differences in China

Variables

Full sample

Female subsample

M1

M2

M3

M4-OLS

M5-Heckman

M6-IV

Female

− .394***

− .399***

− .170**

   

Gender role attitudes

 

− .028*

.007

− .075***

− .076***

− .162**

Female × gender role attitudes

  

− .083***

   

Senior high school

.174***

.170***

.168***

.212***

.217***

.192***

College or higher

.392***

.389***

.385***

.437***

.451***

.418***

Good health

.307***

.309***

.304***

.367***

.375***

.363***

Age

.075***

.076***

.077***

.073***

.078***

.075***

Age square/10

− .010***

− .010***

− .011***

− .010***

− .010***

− .010***

Working hours per week

.003***

.003***

.003***

.004***

.004***

.004***

ISEI

.009***

.009***

.009***

.010***

.010***

.009***

Married

.175***

.177***

.175***

.028

.017

.032

Divorced/widowed

.145**

.142**

.141**

.100

.098

.093

CPC member

.062*

.060*

.061*

.027

.031

.018

Rural household registration

− .004

− .001

.001

− .027

− .027

− .011

Heckman λ

    

.056

 

Hausman test

     

1.88

N

4218

4218

4218

1666

2464

1666

  1. The omitted reference category for education level is junior high school or lower and that for marital status is unmarried. Dummy variables of the provincial level are controlled in all models. Standard errors are clustered by township (subdistrict)
  2. ***p < 0.01, **p < 0.05, and *p < 0.1 (two-tailed test)