Skip to main content

Table 3 Regression analysis of housing wealth (2017, urban areas, N = 5165)

From: Housing wealth inequality in urban China: the transition from welfare allocation to market differentiation

 

Model 1

Model 2

Model 3

Model 4

Model 5

Model 6

Model 7

Model 8

Constant

75.303***

16.370*

− 67.148***

− 48.054***

− 27.617*

− 21.972

− 24.901*

− 26.165*

Male

1.232

-2.226

− 6.222*

− 2.278

− .990

− .331

.312

.667

Age

− .219

.461***

1.209***

.891***

.595**

.461*

.505*

.521**

Family size

− .275

− 2.716**

− .602

− .621

.166

.761

.631

.694

Married with spouse

− 1.666

− 4.424

− 5.351

− 7.720

− 7.867

− 7.989

− 7.416

-8.053

Annual household income

.528***

.476***

.485***

.450***

.448***

.447***

.446***

Years of schooling

4.979***

3.662***

2.292***

1.530*

1.749**

1.725**

Managerial personnel

36.289***

35.347***

33.423***

37.374***

57.778***

Professionals and technicians

− 1.844

3.137

.064

7.011

.908

Clerks

23.335***

24.020***

20.463***

26.403***

34.969***

Self-employed

1.425

5.767

5.162

3.015

4.023

Centrally administered municipalities

143.905***

139.596***

140.180***

140.106***

Provincial capitals

37.287***

35.089***

36.040***

36.088***

Urban hukou

15.273***

18.228***

17.957***

State sector

− 16.555***

− 9.025

Administrative elites in the state sector

− 45.182**

Professionals and technicians in the state sector

3.366

Clerks in the state sector

− 18.942

R2

.000

.190

.211

.293

.353

.356

.359

.360

N

5165

5165

5165

5165

5165

5165

5165

5165

  1. p < 0.05
  2. **p < 0.01
  3. ***p < 0.001