Skip to main content

Table 3 Right words/Key terms in in-work poverty research (2000s-2017)

From: Rethinking the defining contextualization of in-work poverty: the challenge of individualism and globalization

Concept over

Time and space

Key descriptions

Specific context

2000s–2010s

US

(1) Lowest stratum of economic attainment (Shipler 2005);

(2) Ending welfare as we know it (Duncan et al. 2007)

(1) Societal: sociodemographic structures

(2) National: social welfare/social security

Europe

(1) Emergence of in-work poverty and labour market segmentation (Smith et al. 2008);

(2) Low pay (Cappellari 2002);

(3) Poverty in earned income (Ponthieux 2010)

National: economic system (labour market)

2010s–2018

US

(1) Low-income workers (Desmond and Gershenson 2016); at the bottom of the income distribution (Thiede et al. 2015);

(2) Working, uninsured adults (Nolan and Christie 2017);

(3) Working hard, working poor; a global journal (Fields 2012);

(4) A booming demographic (Wicks-Lim 2012)

Societal: social protection system (housing insecure and employment, healthcare programme)

Europe

(1) Re-emergence of working poor phenomenon in Western Europe (Pradella 2015); Widespread phenomenon, “hybrid” nature (Gautié and Ponthieux 2016); a “post-industrial” phenomenon (Marx and Nolan 2012); a pan-European phenomenon (Marx et al. 2012);

(2) Low-wage jobs with poor working conditions and career opportunities (Ilsøe 2016)

(1) Global: international political economy (IPE) perspective. Cross-national perspective

(2) National: economic sectors (low-wage service workers); social protection system

Colombia

Brazil

Most vulnerable workers (Porras 2015);

Disadvantaged economic classes (Escosteguy and Coutinho 2017)

Societal: socioeconomic inequality

Asia (Hong Kong, China)

An important category of poverty; low-paid work (Cheung and Chou 2016)

Societal: socioeconomic context